The defence for that, to me, baffling decision, is that Freeman isn't PL quality - which may be true, but here's the thing, neither are we as it stands. What he is is a player with qualities we completely lack.
We made just the two changes against Liverpool because we're limited with what we have on the bench, Lundstram came off for McGoldrick, rightly so because he was knackered soon into the second half. Freeman coming on, or even starting, would have been a better bet.
With resources as stretched to the limit as they are, to let Freeman go, a year after we paid 5 million for him, without a fee and without a replacement was awful planning.