Bald Archie
Vital Squad Member
What a smart arse you think you are.Spursex - 19/7/2017 11:43
Bald Archie - 18/7/2017 18:07
80 there is truth in what you say, but the Acadamy was set-up as a money making part of the business plan, with more investment / planning than is the case with just about any other academy. It should therefore produce better than the average and may well be doing that up to a certain point. I watch them a fair bit and see players who look good enough for first-team chances (not Onomah) that they don't get, or get a few years after they look ready to step-up.
This is why I have said before that I think there is something wrong in our system at this point. My guess is the bottleneck is Porky, not trusting the younger ones, despite this false image he has been given.
How much McDermott controls who goes into the first-team squad I don't know, but you seem to be saying that if the clubs manager and controller of, amongst other things, the first-team squad wants a couple of Academy lads to step-up into his squad and McD doesn't agree, then it doesn't happen. I find that hard to believe.
Show us your analysis of our academy spend in our accounts, then show us how you've compared it to other PL clubs to support your (once again) erroneous contentions...
And then show us how you think we acquire young potential talent (and ashow us your understanding of the recruitment Rules and Regs and what impact that's had) and why we should be producing way above all the historical norms.
Then show us how many players have come through our academy, how much playing time they've had the frequency in which they've made the breakthrough under which manager and then we can look at the actual truth of Poch being a 'bottleneck'..
Do that, and instead of simply making stuff up to suit your argument, we can all see the truth of it.
1. As you state that my contention that we have spend more than just about any other club on the Academy is (once again) erroneous, I assume you have all the facts and figures yourself. Please produce them to short-cut the matter as I am sure that we would all like to see.
2. Please show me exactly where I have said that our Academy should 'be producing way above all the historical norms.'
3. I said that I suspect Porky is the bottleneck. That is not a statement of fact. On which note why do I not see you picking other peoples posts to pieces when they state something / give an opinion that is not accompanied by a dry and boring list of statistics?