Is Peter Reid correct about Rodwell in this Mirror article?
- Thread starter johnkelv
- Start date
johnkelv
Alert Team
My view is that Jack was a good young player who was injury prone. Everton took the opportunity to cash in and the rest is history. Are City responsible for his current situation at Sunderland as a bit part player. In my view it was his injuries that plagued and blighted his career and had very little to do with his move to City.
Bluedub
Alert Team
A combination of injuries which blighted his first season and a new manager coming in that didn't fancy him in his second season that saw him play so little football at the club. I have wondered would Mancini have persevered with him had he remained in charge, by all accounts he was a huge fan of Jacks.
No doubt his move to City affected his development one way or another but this is not exclusively a City issue, it can happen to any player that moves to a club with greater competition for places, especially when said player is injury prone.
No doubt his move to City affected his development one way or another but this is not exclusively a City issue, it can happen to any player that moves to a club with greater competition for places, especially when said player is injury prone.
Buzz Lightyear
Alert Team
I think if Jack has stayed fit, he would have got into the midfield on a permanent basis.
