mike_field
Vital Football Legend
Can a school make rules about physical appearance when natural.
Not like they are dying the beard bleach blonde is it?
Not like they are dying the beard bleach blonde is it?
The Fear - 4/10/2013 10:32
NI Villan - 4/10/2013 00:11
Are christians allowed into muslim schools? Tired of this country bending over backwards to accommodate minorities. Surely there was a clue in the schools name.
Why would a Christian want to go to an all Muslim school? :16:
NI Villan - 4/10/2013 17:08
The Fear - 4/10/2013 10:32
NI Villan - 4/10/2013 00:11
Are christians allowed into muslim schools? Tired of this country bending over backwards to accommodate minorities. Surely there was a clue in the schools name.
Why would a Christian want to go to an all Muslim school? :16:
The same reason that muslims want to attend a catholic school. It may be the highest ranked school in the area.
JamTomorrow - 4/10/2013 16:23
The Fear - 4/10/2013 09:33
genuine religious reason
Oxymoron
The Fear - 4/10/2013 17:23
JamTomorrow - 4/10/2013 16:23
The Fear - 4/10/2013 09:33
genuine religious reason
Oxymoron
who are you calling a moron mush!
:17:
mike_field - 5/10/2013 00:40
People still not getting natural puberty is not a part of a school uniform?
Villa_Grizzly - 5/10/2013 03:59
My general position is that anything that is biological attached\grows out of you or from you, is your business.
Wurzel - 4/10/2013 17:09
Not just Muslim's, everyone's outraged these days.I blame the internet and daytime phone-ins. It's Fears fault.
ClivetheVillan - 4/10/2013 19:24
FFS i get the moron bit but sticking the Oxy in front o it has confused me, Oxy could mean oxygen so an air moron wtf? :37: :69: :17:
mike_field - 5/10/2013 03:45
No NI, it's based on the uniform policy.
That is restated time and again in other coverage, but admittedly I linked the report that talked about appearance as well, but it was a report that was later in the day, so if you look back 'appearance' became a new addition once it was obviously pointing out uniform was a wank idea.
The head talked about uniform policy, and whilst I more than get students benefit from a uniform, you cannot control nature.
And whilst I get unnatural appearance changes such as dying hair should be controlled. Natural hair growth?
Will they ban kids who have a crew cut next?
What about a girl who has long hair and then goes for perm, or a short cut?
We aren't talking piss taking like skin head, or Mohawk, or dying purple or green?
My first thought, that I said I'd keep to myself, was actually, how many white students have grown a pathetic facial muff at this school and had the same treatment but not made headlines - because it's obviously racial driven, so it won't make the press?
Any staff members have a beard?
Any staff members have a tash?
Any staff members have long hair?
Any females teachers dye their hair, or males for that matter?
Wear a push up bra, a more complimentary pant?
This is why I liked the idea of the reaction because I knew so many would go for Moslem, wanting it their own way, pushing their boundaries, doing this doing that doing the other.
That's the story that makes the press. What came before?
Never dismiss the power of a stereotype and the bullshit that will lead some to say anything that doesn't actually apply when you think about it.
kefkat - 4/10/2013 02:14
Of state schools generally speaking Catholic schools have always had a good reputation and usually are the top schools in an area.
Why have they sent their boys to a Catholic school I would like to know? It seems very odd to me. It isn't a predominately Muslim school. It really doesn't make sense to me as to why the boys have been sent their.
Surely there must be a Mosque school in their area. Beards aren't part of their faith: It is not in The Qumran about them. It is a set of traditions/rituals.
Some would say 'they are at least trying to integrate there youngsters into mixed schooling' I don't buy that.
It sounds absolutely bonkers to me the parents sending them to a Catholic school
david-avfc - 4/10/2013 17:18
over reaction from all sides. Suspending someone for having a beard is over the top but then getting your self suspended for not shaving is stupid as well. Saying its because of religious beliefs when [apparently] it isn't is even worse.
mike_field - 5/10/2013 04:45
No NI, it's based on the uniform policy.
That is restated time and again in other coverage, but admittedly I linked the report that talked about appearance as well, but it was a report that was later in the day, so if you look back 'appearance' became a new addition once it was obviously pointing out uniform was a wank idea.
The head talked about uniform policy, and whilst I more than get students benefit from a uniform, you cannot control nature.
And whilst I get unnatural appearance changes such as dying hair should be controlled. Natural hair growth?
Will they ban kids who have a crew cut next?
What about a girl who has long hair and then goes for perm, or a short cut?
We aren't talking piss taking like skin head, or Mohawk, or dying purple or green?
My first thought, that I said I'd keep to myself, was actually, how many white students have grown a pathetic facial muff at this school and had the same treatment but not made headlines - because it's obviously racial driven, so it won't make the press?
Any staff members have a beard?
Any staff members have a tash?
Any staff members have long hair?
Any females teachers dye their hair, or males for that matter?
Wear a push up bra, a more complimentary pant?
This is why I liked the idea of the reaction because I knew so many would go for Moslem, wanting it their own way, pushing their boundaries, doing this doing that doing the other.
That's the story that makes the press. What came before?
Never dismiss the power of a stereotype and the bullshit that will lead some to say anything that doesn't actually apply when you think about it.