Hollow earth

My theory is the earth is a nucleus but on a bigger scale. The inner sun would be the nucleolus. Look at images of the hollow earth diagrams and a nucleus and there identical.
 
The fact that you can't spell, or use grammar correctly, leads me to conclude what you think isn't going to rock the Scientific community.

I suggest you stop thinking for a while, and leave it to those qualified to do so.
 
This is ridiculous. Everyone knows the moon is made of cheese, which is why we haven't returned because it would upset the dairy industry worldwide which is a front for the Rothchilds child porn empire. Wake up sheeple :13: :14: :39:
 
I don't really trust videos on Youtube mate, honestly that could be anything. People make money off views and subscribers as you'll know if you watched the UFO Theater video I posted in the UFO Disclosure thread.

It's why so much credible UFO videos etc. are lost among the millions of fakes and hoaxes.

What part of earth is that? And why has no astronaut, airplane pilot, or ship captain ever exposed it?

 
HeathfieldRoad1874 - 9/10/2016 21:47

The fact that you can't spell, or use grammar correctly, leads me to conclude what you think isn't going to rock the Scientific community.

I suggest you stop thinking for a while, and leave it to those qualified to do so.
Click to expand...

I'm dyslexic you arrogant prat. It's a harmless debate and you come out with personal insults. Emotional intelligence is a far higher form of intelligence than your ability to spell.
 
Stephen Jay Hawkings - 9/10/2016 21:51

I don't really trust videos on Youtube mate, honestly that could be anything. People make money off views and subscribers as you'll know if you watched the UFO Theater video I posted in the UFO Disclosure thread.

It's why so much credible UFO videos etc. are lost among the millions of fakes and hoaxes.

What part of earth is that? And why has no astronaut, airplane pilot, or ship captain ever exposed it?
Click to expand...

I agree there is a load of nonesence on there and it's hard to know what to take seriously but my view will change during debates like this.
Did you know the North Pole is a no fly zone.
 
Dyslexic or not, since you arrived on Vital Villa you have shown a propensity for wild, speculative theories. You seem unable to follow logical reason, even when spoon fed it.

Let real Scientists do real Science, and stop bothering us with your pseudo-science.
 
Sasquatch - 9/10/2016 22:21


Did you know the North Pole is a no fly zone.
Click to expand...

No, there isn't. Boeing even issue guidance on flying over the poles.

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/aero_16/polar_story.html
 
HeathfieldRoad1874 - 9/10/2016 22:21

Dyslexic or not, since you arrived on Vital Villa you have shown a propensity for wild, speculative theories. You seem unable to follow logical reason, even when spoon fed it.

Let real Scientists do real Science, and stop bothering us with your pseudo-science.
Click to expand...

If you don't like it don't reply.
 
Sasquatch - 9/10/2016 22:30

HeathfieldRoad1874 - 9/10/2016 22:21

Dyslexic or not, since you arrived on Vital Villa you have shown a propensity for wild, speculative theories. You seem unable to follow logical reason, even when spoon fed it.

Let real Scientists do real Science, and stop bothering us with your pseudo-science.
Click to expand...

If you don't like it don't reply.
Click to expand...

Why? So you can delude yourself further, without challenge?

Trying to impose your views on others, and promote your crackpot theories is something you can continue to do, but I will bring your logic crashing to the ground every time.

Alternatively, you could just join in the normal threads and debates on this great site, like the vast majority of the members do.
 
I was enjoying your challenging opinions until you got personal. Your hardly bringing the theory's crashing to the ground either, that's just your ego.
 
Bollocks were you. You haven't answered one serious point I've raised on this thread so far. For example, answer this.

HeathfieldRoad1874 - 9/10/2016 16:59

Sasquatch - 9/10/2016 16:51

The moon rang like a bell for over an hour after a Luna module crashed into it. Would it have done this is it wasn't hollow?
Click to expand...

Are you a Geologist?
Click to expand...
 
And how does this affect your thoughts?

HeathfieldRoad1874 - 9/10/2016 17:50

The Japanese Hayabusa spacecraft in 2004.

NASAs Deep Space Climate Observatory in 2015.

Japanese craft, the Himawari-8 in 2015.

Russian satellite Elektro-L


It seems you're a bit out of date.
Click to expand...
 
HeathfieldRoad1874 - 9/10/2016 22:42

And how does this affect your thoughts?

HeathfieldRoad1874 - 9/10/2016 17:50

The Japanese Hayabusa spacecraft in 2004.

NASAs Deep Space Climate Observatory in 2015.

Japanese craft, the Himawari-8 in 2015.

Russian satellite Elektro-L


It seems you're a bit out of date.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

No photos though

Have you researched Admiral Bird?
 
Sasquatch - 9/10/2016 22:45

HeathfieldRoad1874 - 9/10/2016 22:42

And how does this affect your thoughts?

HeathfieldRoad1874 - 9/10/2016 17:50

The Japanese Hayabusa spacecraft in 2004.

NASAs Deep Space Climate Observatory in 2015.

Japanese craft, the Himawari-8 in 2015.

Russian satellite Elektro-L


It seems you're a bit out of date.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

No photos though

Have you researched Admiral Bird?
Click to expand...

Have you googled any of these, Chris?

You seem to be struggling with the concept of a debate. You present an argument. Someone (in this case, me) presents evidence contradicting your argument. You counter with more information, or a correction.

You just seem to ignore what you don't want to hear.
 
Who's Chris?

If I researched every opinion you google it would take me a week to come back with an answer. I'm not going to study geology for 5 years to have a debate.
 
You raised the point, not me. Maybe you should have googled it before you posted?

Do you know who said "The moon rang like a bell"? I do, and he was a Geologist. His conclusions were very different from yours, so I would be interested to hear how you reached your conclusion.

I'm happy to curtail the personal stuff if you'll enter into an actual debate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.