Welshtel
Vital Football Hero
I've had it on my mind over the last few weeks to put up this thread. The carnage in Orlando, Jo Cox, and other events just push the envelope in terms of unbelief that society tolerates nothing being done to stem the invasion of guns into our countries.
To keep the argument firmly here for a moment, where did the gunman in the Birstall killing of Jo Cox get his weapon? Then ask yourself where all these weapons come from and why aren't they prevented?
HOW COME BRITISH SOCIETY HAS GOT INTO THIS STATE?
To switch to the USA for a moment and the shootings there. HOW COME the US authorities have not simply stated that NO private person needs an automatic weapon? OK defend your homes, if you must do it yourself, if your police aren't up to the task, with a gun but surely a Smith and Wesson .38 or even .44 is enough for that, powerful guns to be certain. WHY WOULD ANYONE want an automatic weapon, what are they expecting to come through the door? A battalion? Now they have a situation where 50 were wiped out by a nutter that they knew about being unstable that got hold of an automatic weapon. CRAZY to have allowed it! The FBI need a makeover.
Whichever you agree with, no guns, guns or unlimited guns, we have to sort out a sense of reason that puts society into a safe, protected state without allowing extremes to take over.
To my mind, not enough is being spent on keeping the people of this country (and the USA too) safe. Not enough is spent on illegal immigration and illegal imports. We have instead allowed an 'anything goes' situation and borders MUST be an issue with us leaking all sorts of things. DRUGS too, same thing, so where is the law putting a stop to things? IS it that we are too soft on crime and too underfunded to stop it? Is there enough funding but is it that there is corruption in the law enforcement agencies that allows stuff to enter the country? In this case we need to spend more on creating departments that look at making sure corruption cannot exist.
The long and short of it is that we aren't doing enough and too many are able to get hold of weapons and things that they should not be able to. I'm naive? No. Simple facts say that this is what we should be aiming at, getting society straight. And if this or any other government can't or won't do it, get rid of them. We need to fight issues with politicians that WILL get it done. The political parties are only interested in their own brand of administration, how about a cross-party group that is dedicated to STOPPING illegal imports of ANYTHING for example?
How about anything that is both PROPER and EFFECTIVE at stopping the rot?
To keep the argument firmly here for a moment, where did the gunman in the Birstall killing of Jo Cox get his weapon? Then ask yourself where all these weapons come from and why aren't they prevented?
HOW COME BRITISH SOCIETY HAS GOT INTO THIS STATE?
To switch to the USA for a moment and the shootings there. HOW COME the US authorities have not simply stated that NO private person needs an automatic weapon? OK defend your homes, if you must do it yourself, if your police aren't up to the task, with a gun but surely a Smith and Wesson .38 or even .44 is enough for that, powerful guns to be certain. WHY WOULD ANYONE want an automatic weapon, what are they expecting to come through the door? A battalion? Now they have a situation where 50 were wiped out by a nutter that they knew about being unstable that got hold of an automatic weapon. CRAZY to have allowed it! The FBI need a makeover.
Whichever you agree with, no guns, guns or unlimited guns, we have to sort out a sense of reason that puts society into a safe, protected state without allowing extremes to take over.
To my mind, not enough is being spent on keeping the people of this country (and the USA too) safe. Not enough is spent on illegal immigration and illegal imports. We have instead allowed an 'anything goes' situation and borders MUST be an issue with us leaking all sorts of things. DRUGS too, same thing, so where is the law putting a stop to things? IS it that we are too soft on crime and too underfunded to stop it? Is there enough funding but is it that there is corruption in the law enforcement agencies that allows stuff to enter the country? In this case we need to spend more on creating departments that look at making sure corruption cannot exist.
The long and short of it is that we aren't doing enough and too many are able to get hold of weapons and things that they should not be able to. I'm naive? No. Simple facts say that this is what we should be aiming at, getting society straight. And if this or any other government can't or won't do it, get rid of them. We need to fight issues with politicians that WILL get it done. The political parties are only interested in their own brand of administration, how about a cross-party group that is dedicated to STOPPING illegal imports of ANYTHING for example?
How about anything that is both PROPER and EFFECTIVE at stopping the rot?

