Gills_Horse
Vital Reserves Team
For your viewing pleasure guys. Once again not in a pub... next one may be, watch this space.
The factory with a forum style questions and answers from fans. Revenue, revenue, revenue.Be great if you could do the next one in the Queen’s Head.
It’s halfway down the Maidstone Road.
Watched it last night. Agree with the majority of your views. Interesting that all 3 of you would prefer Harris as manager over Clemence, but that doesn’t seem to be the majority view of the Gills fanbase.
We don't know all the facts but my own opinion for what it is worth is Harris spent too bigger percentage of the budget on players who were not likely to score goals.For me the most likely reason is budget management.Thats why Jackett now appears to have a greater say.The decision was to grow more naturally not to try to buy success at any price.Personally I wouldn't prefer him to come back and am not pining for him, but if you asked me is it working under Clemence - I would say no. So by that marker I would say that getting rid of Harris when we did wasn't wise. We have wrecked our own season really by doing so.
Me too Archie.The sacking of Harris was madness simply for its timing. It disrupted everything from pre season preparation to stopping any momentum we had gained in its tracks.
Not having someone lined up to immediately take over compounded the error.
Clemence can do no wrong this season. I'll judge him by where we are next Christmas.
I can see that happening too. I really don't like the modern game in that respect. I much prefer a manager/ coach be given 3 years.Ref to Clem, I think if we don’t finish in the top seven, he’ll get binned and we’ll go back to an experienced league manager.
Just my opinion.
Possibly because the fans want everything instantly .I can see that happening too. I really don't like the modern game in that respect. I much prefer a manager/ coach be given 3 years.
Year1 to see what you've got and what you haven't
Year 2 to get your guys in and establish your "style of play"
Year 3 go for broke.
Not going to happen these days
Yes when you look at their comparative points per game (for this season) then it seems likely we’d have had more points now if we’d kept Harris, but the powers that be decided he had to go, for whatever reason!Personally I wouldn't prefer him to come back and am not pining for him, but if you asked me is it working under Clemence - I would say no. So by that marker I would say that getting rid of Harris when we did wasn't wise. We have wrecked our own season really by doing so.
How is the way BG is being treated making you feel sick and angry? Genuine question I just don’t see that he’s being treated badly. He’s pretty much universally loved by the support (rightly so).Possibly because the fans want everything instantly .
What we can't buy a two million pounds striker and a new stadium?
Get rid of Scally that will be the answer .
BG is trying something different he has started but his plan takes time . Frankly we are never going to buy our way up the leagues short of having silly money from outside the club.Which can suddenly disappear leaving clubs worse off and possibly disappearing out of existence.
Perhaps I am starting to be glad I can't afford to get down for a few weeks.Frankly the current way BG is being treated is making me feel sick and angry.
WHERE IS THE TRUST?
BRING BACK SCALLY FRANKLY AT LEAST WE ALL KNEW HE WOULD NOT HAVE THE FUNDS.
I believe he has appointed Clemence and said as much as it is wise to say about changing to a more long term policy of development and gradual improvement.Meanwhile fans are wanting to attack the whole approach of Clemence and even saying the B G should not have sacked Harris.In my opinion that is attacking the chairman and undermining his work.Over about 27 years Scally lost the faith of fans I totally get that .The way things have started I can see Brad and Shannon not sticking around if they get anywhere near the same sort of treatment.I fear defeat tomorrow the mood might turn nasty .How is the way BG is being treated making you feel sick and angry? Genuine question I just don’t see that he’s being treated badly. He’s pretty much universally loved by the support (rightly so).
So by even questioning Clemence’s record so far (surely that’s reasonable we’ve only won 3 times in the league at home since he took over 4 months ago, the most recent being a scrappy 1-0 win against Suttton in December) that’s “attacking “ the chairman? That just doesn’t make sense . Surely everyone massively appreciates Brad and Shannon’s efforts, but you’re allowed to make observations that may be negative about the management. If that makes Brad and Shannon want to not stick around it would just remind me of Scally’s brattish behaviour nearer the end where no one could say anything negative without him getting in a childish strop. These people are business people, they understand they’ll make decisions that won’t always be right and when they do they’ll need to correct them. I’m hopeful this isn’t one of those times and all will work out well for Clemence but, it has not been a good opening 4 months for him and not it’s unreasonable / attacking to point that out.I believe he has appointed Clemence and said as much as it is wise to say about changing to a more long term policy of development and gradual improvement.Meanwhile fans are wanting to attack the whole approach of Clemence and even saying the B G should not have sacked Harris.In my opinion that is attacking the chairman and undermining his work.Over about 27 years Scally lost the faith of fans I totally get that .The way things have started I can see Brad and Shannon not sticking around if they get anywhere near the same sort of treatment.I fear defeat tomorrow the mood might turn nasty .
Is that something I enjoy?
No.
it makes me angry and sad.That there is so much entitlement.