That’s not exactly a balanced view.
The financial woes during Scally’s time have all been the result of exceptional one-off events: ITV digital, Centerplate and COVID. 2 of those events are entirely unpredictable and exogenous.
I suppose he could have been more prudent and held a buffer of contingency for rainy days. That would be a practice at odds with any other club; and I’d bet that the usual crowd would moan about lack of player investment.
He has also tried to diversify the business in to leisure / catering to make the business more sustainable on the longer term.
Tony Smith, by contrast, simply failed to grasp the opportunity to fix the systemic problems facing the club. He failed and it is a shame he paid a hefty financial price.
To echo my original point - it’s strange that Smith is portrayed as the hero and Scally the villain.
Tony Smith didn't try to fix anything, he simply put money in to keep the club going as a fan until such point as he couldn't anymore. As I understand it it was never his plan to take long term control of the club or fix the problems, it was to get us through to the end of the 94/95 season.
PS ran up £13m worth of debt on his watch and only had ITV digital to blame (forgetting the fact PS proudly boasted at the time how we'd be in a prime position compared to others as we hadn't spent any of the ITV due money before we'd received it) up to the point the debt was restructured/cleared although now it's a good reason/excuse to cover for mismanagement. Centre point is irrelevant as he won the case and we got paid out. Covid ill give you, although we don't know the full facts or impact.
There was a £1m plus overspend on the building of the GRS, a £2m overspend on the construction of the MS and not sure what the RE cost.
Scally set up the conference and banqueting facility (which cost more than it should) in his words "to bring in the necessary funds to support the football side of the business" (think the target was 500k a year) only to a few years later outsource it to Compass which ultimately lead to the Centre Plate case. Not seen any evidence yet that the banqueting brings in anywhere near that, although any contributions currently stop the shit going above our neck.
Since our restructuring we've recieved quite significant transfer fees, yet it's always been spent of running costs and debt, despite us being debt free (PS words) since our debt restructuring in 2007?
We clearly have differing views on this issue so this will be my last post on this thread and as you've said it's getting boring. Clearly you believe most of what comes out of PS mouth as gospel, unfortunately I've seen different first hand. Yes PS has done some good things in his time here but please don't pretend the financial mismanagement of the club were caused by things not of his making.
Without TS GFC almost certainly would not have made it through to the summer of 95 for PS to even consider buying the club and secondly without TS giving his 'support' (as suggested above) to PS deal, I doubt PS takeover deal would have gone through.