Frossum - 11/8/2015 18:33
If Gabby plays as well as he did last game for the whole season I would be fine with that...
...what, you mean you'd be fine with a striker who manages just one tame shot on goal all game for the rest of the season?
OK, let's try a differeng tack, shall we?
How many Premier League clubs currently have a forward on their books that - of fit and on form - you would field instead of Gabby every time?
Arsenal: Walcott,Giroud,Wellbeck, Sancez. 4.
Bournemouth: Callum Wilson. 1
Chelsea: Costa, Falcao, Remy. 3
Crystal Palace: Zaha, Baqmford. 2.
Everton: Lukaku, Miralles. 2.
Leicester: Vardy. He's a twat, but even so. 1.
Liverpool: Benteke (obviously), Sturridge, Ings. 3.
Man City: Bony, Aguero, Sterling, Dzeko. 4.
Man United: Hernandez, Rooney, Mata. 3.
Newcastle United: Cisse.1.
Norwich: 0.
Southampton: Pelle, Rodriguez, probably Long. 3.
Stoke: Afellay, Krkic, Crouch. 3. Hell, maybe even Joselu. 4.
Sunderland: Defoe. 1.
Swansea: Ayew, Michu, Gomis. 3.
Spurs: Kane, Adebayor. 2.
Watford: 0.
WBA: Rondon, Lambert. 2.
West Ham: Sakho, Carroll. 2.
Well, there you go. All but two Premier League clubs (in my opinion) have a player on their books who would walk straight into our first teamahead of Gabby. Some have two or more. I think I'mbeing pretty generous as well - there's quite a few players who I could have suggested, but didn't.
Even if you disagree with some of those suggestions, I douby you'll be able to dispute over half of them. Maybe not even 75%.
Which is a pretty sorry state of affairs, really. We should be aiming higher.