Free Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon | Page 40 | Vital Football

Free Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Approximately 650,000 sexual offences were committed on 16 to 59 year olds and dealt with by the police in England and Wales for the year ended March, 2017. VG, are you suggesting that these were all committed by men of Pakistani heritage; if not, why aren't you condemning all such offences? You will note that these figures exclude children.
 
Approximately 650,000 sexual offences were committed on 16 to 59 year olds and dealt with by the police in England and Wales for the year ended March, 2017. VG, are you suggesting that these were all committed by men of Pakistani heritage; if not, why aren't you condemning all such offences? You will note that these figures exclude children.

84% of convicted , type 1 grooming gangs are Muslims.
 
Read the commentary on Mein Kampf and see for yourself if you see any similarity with events of to-day and then in, your own words, explain why you may or may not agree.

No I'm sorry, I think the onus is on you to explain why Muslims (over other religions) are specifically being targeted in Europe "without reason".
 
No I'm sorry, I think the onus is on you to explain why Muslims (over other religions) are specifically being targeted in Europe "without reason".
Sorry my friend, it's you and VG targeting Asian muslims not us; so, you need to explain.
 
84% of convicted , type 1 grooming gangs are Muslims.
84% of what ffs? It's no good giving percentages without mentioning finite numbers ffs. Say there were 6,500 offences representing 84% committed by Asian grooming gangs; that would still represent only 1% of the overall total and yet you and 3 x 6 want to demonise all muslims and even then on some unsound historical basis.

I sincerely hope when you make your racist views known you actually spare a thought always for the victims whoever the perpetrators.
 
Sorry my friend, it's you and VG targeting Asian muslims not us; so, you need to explain.

It's 56% of the country that think Islam is a threat to Western democracy

https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/07/03/77-bombings-muslims-islam-britain-poll_n_7694452.html

Come on, I'm not asking you to explain why they are wrong, I'm just asking you to explain what the reason for the concern is. Can you please just answer one, simple question without trying to deflect, abuse, redirect, confuse or ignore
 
It's 56% of the country that think Islam is a threat to Western democracy

https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/07/03/77-bombings-muslims-islam-britain-poll_n_7694452.html

Come on, I'm not asking you to explain why they are wrong, I'm just asking you to explain what the reason for the concern is. Can you please just answer one, simple question without trying to deflect, abuse, redirect, confuse or ignore
That article is over three years old but you're still doing it. You're condemning all muslims for attacks carried out by those who claim wrongly to do it in the name of islam. Terrorism is the problem not islam. But VG has the answer - ban islam in the west. Do you not think VG that such a course of action would be like a recruiting sergeant for potential terrorists instead of building bridges.
 
That article is over three years old but you're still doing it. You're condemning all muslims for attacks carried out by those who claim wrongly to do it in the name of islam. Terrorism is the problem not islam. But VG has the answer - ban islam in the west. Do you not think VG that such a course of action would be like a recruiting sergeant for potential terrorists instead of building bridges.

Yes , that article is over 3 years old .
Do you think that the 56% figure would have risen or dropped , in the mean time ?

Once again you are in the minority Wayne.
 
You're condemning all muslims for attacks carried out by those who claim wrongly to do it in the name of islam. Terrorism is the problem not islam. .

I can't keep going over this but I absolutely promise you I am not condemning all Muslims for attacks, and I never have. And I can't even comment on the last sentence -there is no point to be honest as you will have come up with a different argument next week and will have forgotten all about this post.
 
Far right extremism and attacks the fastest growing in UK. Still behind jihadists but coming up fast. I wonder what percentage of people would consider your ravings a threat to democracy.
 
Another load of bollocks. FFS VG, you asked people to have a voice, but you need one, because you are only spouting off a racists view. You haven't got your own independent thought. You purely recite a bloke that has been shown to try and screw up British justice.
 
The title could just as well be National Socialists against Jews or Mary against Protestants or henry against catholics or burma against Rohingyas or NF/BM against blacks or KKK v blacks and jews, us govenment v chinese, blacks or red indians, etc, etc.

Legitimate concerns against the actions of societies, religeons, etc are legitimate and freedom of speech. Once you move to condemning whole swarths of people, wanting deportation, then you move towards genocide.

There is no danger as long as criticism is allowed and all people including immigrants have to follow the countries democratic laws.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.