valenciagill
Vital Football Hero
Then what is your solution?
The banning of Islam in the west.
Then what is your solution?
Clearly that response must have taxed your brain somewhat but how would you actually go about doing it?The banning of Islam in the west.
Approximately 650,000 sexual offences were committed on 16 to 59 year olds and dealt with by the police in England and Wales for the year ended March, 2017. VG, are you suggesting that these were all committed by men of Pakistani heritage; if not, why aren't you condemning all such offences? You will note that these figures exclude children.
Make Islam illegal , and deport (to the ME) those who wish to carry on practising it.Clearly that response must have taxed your brain somewhat but how would you actually go about doing it?
Read the commentary on Mein Kampf and see for yourself if you see any similarity with events of to-day and then in, your own words, explain why you may or may not agree.
84% of convicted , type 1 grooming gangs are Muslims.
Sorry my friend, it's you and VG targeting Asian muslims not us; so, you need to explain.No I'm sorry, I think the onus is on you to explain why Muslims (over other religions) are specifically being targeted in Europe "without reason".
Yes, it's official! You are mentally deranged or you can rewrite your reply to your mate VG.No, 84% are "Asian". The research doesn't state how many of the other 16% are non-asian Muslims, or how many of the 84% are non-Muslim
No, 84% are "Asian". The research doesn't state how many of the other 16% are non-asian Muslims, or how many of the 84% are non-Muslim
84% of what ffs? It's no good giving percentages without mentioning finite numbers ffs. Say there were 6,500 offences representing 84% committed by Asian grooming gangs; that would still represent only 1% of the overall total and yet you and 3 x 6 want to demonise all muslims and even then on some unsound historical basis.84% of convicted , type 1 grooming gangs are Muslims.
Sorry my friend, it's you and VG targeting Asian muslims not us; so, you need to explain.
That article is over three years old but you're still doing it. You're condemning all muslims for attacks carried out by those who claim wrongly to do it in the name of islam. Terrorism is the problem not islam. But VG has the answer - ban islam in the west. Do you not think VG that such a course of action would be like a recruiting sergeant for potential terrorists instead of building bridges.It's 56% of the country that think Islam is a threat to Western democracy
https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/07/03/77-bombings-muslims-islam-britain-poll_n_7694452.html
Come on, I'm not asking you to explain why they are wrong, I'm just asking you to explain what the reason for the concern is. Can you please just answer one, simple question without trying to deflect, abuse, redirect, confuse or ignore
That article is over three years old but you're still doing it. You're condemning all muslims for attacks carried out by those who claim wrongly to do it in the name of islam. Terrorism is the problem not islam. But VG has the answer - ban islam in the west. Do you not think VG that such a course of action would be like a recruiting sergeant for potential terrorists instead of building bridges.
You're condemning all muslims for attacks carried out by those who claim wrongly to do it in the name of islam. Terrorism is the problem not islam. .