Three good managers?
I do not think too many people would have described Warburton or MON as good managers; certainly not on their performances here.
Whether you like it or not, the average tenure of a Championship manager is ten months; that's just not us, but all of the clubs in the division.
Why do you think that the constant managerial change is necessary?
How much of it is down to the fact that clubs do not have the luxury of being able to build teams any more?
Players and agents have all of the power now; the good ones are not prepared to hang around waiting for a change in the teams fortunes and the bad ones sit tight on good contracts.
How much of the change is down to the new breed (last 20 years or so) of supporter, the Sky generation supporter, and their constant mithering for instant gratification?
Does not take much for these guys to vote with their feet, and then its panic stations in the Boardroom.
For every Club like us with a very loyal fan base there are ten or fifteen who do not have one.
So when you talk of reciprocation, what is it you want reciprocating?
You only have to look on here to see people writing us off. We are far from being a top two side, but last season we managed 9th with some pretty abysmal performances under both AK and MON. We have lost Colback and gained several decent defenders and midfielders. SL's football is similar to AKs, but he does give the impression to me that he wants to get the ball forward quicker, rather than keeping it at the back for the sake of it. Will take time to settle, but SL does need to have us at least competing for the top six, as we did for a lot of last season.