Is that what its saying? I thought we were the claimants and this is regarding a misrepresentation in the accounts of liabilities by 3 half million?
Fawaz must have had his crack team of lawyers on the case that day!Yes, we were the claimants over the misrep and lost, despite the fact it was basically a misrep.
The contract included what’s known as an “Entire agreement clause” - these don’t always work but when worded appropriately have the effect of excluding anything that was said between the parties other than what is explicitly in the contract. The court here has found that the clause is effective therefore M cannot pursue the claim against F for the difference between the claimed debt and the actual debt.
Fawaz must have had his crack team of lawyers on the case that day!![]()
Depends if they own a bakery...I wonder if any of them will get a visit from friends of Mr M?![]()
Depends if they own a bakery...
Bloody arsehole.
Or a fridge.I think EM knew this was a long shot at recovering the debt and that he had been screwed by Fawaz. Worth a try. Don't think he will be buying another football club from him.
Lot of talk on Twitter that Fawaz will be buying Charlton Athletic