Your argument is circular and irrational and begins with an erronoeus assertion. This Type 1 stuff is a new form of words to describe an old problem. If you wish to use that term do not think it then proves a case. By this definition Type 1 grooming gags have been recruiting young girls for prostitution for centuries.
My late father was a great lover of racial stereotyping and would often talk of Maltese pimps abusing English girls to recruit them. The papers at that time revelled in such stuff. The Maltese were not the first and will not be the last.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messina_Brothers
Meanwhile British gangs have always been involved in the trade doing their unpleasant work and only coming surfacing when individual cases were prosecuted. No one ever called them Christian, or white. I have no interest in doing so but can you imagine if I relentlessly scoured the news in order to record every sexual crime committed by a white person and then posted it up here complaining that the media weren't joining the dots.
There is ample evidence that priests operated in an organised way and shared victims over many years. You only have to look at the latest revelation of priests controlling a whole institution of nuns for virtual sexual slavery to understand the organisation of evil. Human beings are capable of extreme depravity regardless of race, class, ethnicity, or religion.
No one pretends that we do not have much work to do on the attitudes and behaviour of some muslim men towards women and girls. If we seek to blame the entire problem of abuse on them we protect a whole army of other abusers and desert their victims.