EFL - OPEN LETTER | Vital Football

EFL - OPEN LETTER

SeasideEssexXile

Vital Football Legend
The sooner this tw@t fcuks off the better:

An open letter to all interested parties.
Blackpool FC

The EFL has received many communications from a wide spectrum of people following the announcement that the Court have appointed a Receiver over a number of assets owned by the Oystons, including Blackpool Football Club (Properties) Ltd, which owns Blackpool FC.
We have spoken with the Receiver who is expecting the decision by the Court to be sealed during this week, at which stage his appointment will be confirmed.

Our immediate priority will be to ensure that the Club will be able to fulfil their remaining fixtures this season and that all the arrangements that are necessary to achieve this, are in place.

At a meeting with various supporter groups of the Club on the 20th March 2018, I stated that our objective was ‘to create some stability around the Club and return the focus of the Club’s supporters to the performance on the pitch rather than activities off it’ and that to deliver this ‘would depend on other people outside this room at that time’.
Our objective has remained the same and the appointment of the Receiver may well be the catalyst to achieve this.

As we have made clear on numerous occasions, the EFL operates inside a regulatory framework that governs our approach to matters. It is this framework that has often frustrated parties who think we should have done more with regard to the ownership of Blackpool Football Club and is now the same framework that provides the flexibility for the Board, to determine if a sporting sanction of a 12 point deduction is to be enforced.

It is not mandatory that the 12 point sanction MUST be applied but the circumstances of the appointment of the Receiver need to be fully considered and the appropriate decision taken in accordance with the Regulations. The Board will need to consider, for example, whether the period of receivership delivers any reduction in the level of debt at the Club that is not available to another Club outside an insolvency process, and if the competitive balance of the Division is impacted as a result of the appointment of the Receiver.
We have committed to working with the Receiver and to be consistent with the objective outlined on the 20th March 2018, hope to find a solution that will deliver the stability that will benefit the Club going forward.

The Board will receive an update at its next meeting on the 6th March and we will look to bring the matter to a conclusion, as quickly as possible.

Yours sincerely,

Shaun Harvey
 
I wouldn't expect anything else at this stage. In principle it should be straightfoward for the receiver to pass both criteria to not apply a 12 point deduction. Firstly, demonstrating the club can fulfil its fixtures and other commitments. Secondly, that the club is not in receipt of a financial advantage over other clubs because of the insolvency- for example from debt relief (which isn't the case for BFC)
 
In Shaun Harvey we are dealing with a man who has proven that he lacks the ability to interpret and/or understand the rules of the EFL, an organisation that he has presided over for quite some time.
Both the EFL and Shaun Harvey are not most definitely not fit for purpose.
 
I am quite positive about this. I read it that 'we haven't helped you the last 4 years on O because our rules, but we can use the flexibility in our rules now to not apply the 12 points deduction'
 
Last edited:
In Shaun Harvey we are dealing with a man who has proven that he lacks the ability to interpret and/or understand the rules of the EFL, an organisation that he has presided over for quite some time.
Both the EFL and Shaun Harvey are not most definitely not fit for purpose.

He's been a useless self serving turd of a man. Good riddance.
 
Jack's piece on this:

EFL vows to help Blackpool receivers 'as quickly as possible' and says 12-point penalty is not mandatory
  • The EFL will decide whether or not to serve Blackpool a points deduction
  • A high court judge approved the appointment of receivers to help sell the club
  • It will settle owner Owen Oyston's £25m debt to club president Valeri Belokon
  • The EFL says its 'immediate priority' is to ensure Blackpool fulfill their fixtures
The English Football League has promised it will decide on whether or not Blackpool should be docked 12 points this season as 'quickly as possible'.
Last week, a high court judge approved the appointment of receivers from David Rubin and Partners to oversee the sale of the club in order to settle long-term owner Owen Oyston's £25million debt to former business partner and club president Valeri Belokon.
According to EFL rules, clubs that require court protection from 'insolvency events' should be docked 12 points so they do not gain a competitive advantage from having large amounts of debt written off.
9976294-0-image-a-27_1550533250994.jpg


The English Football League has promised it will decide on whether or not Blackpool should be docked 12 points this season as 'quickly as possible', after receivers were appointed last week

The situation at Bloomfield Road, however, is more complicated, as the club does not have serious debts, the Oyston family does. In fact, the club is owed money by other Oyston businesses.
That is why David Rubin and Partners are acting as receivers on behalf of one of Oyston's creditors, Belokon, and not as administrators or liquidators appointed by the court to settle as many of the club's debts as possible.
With this in mind, EFL chief executive Shaun Harvey has written 'an open letter to all interested parties' that has been seen by Press Association Sport.
In the letter, Harvey explains it has heard from a 'wide spectrum of people' following last week's court announcement and has spoken to the receivers who expect to take control this week.
The 48-year-old, who announced his decision to step down as EFL boss at the end of the season on Monday, then writes that the league's 'immediate priority' is to make sure the club fulfils its fixtures.
Referring to a meeting he held with Blackpool supporters last March, Harvey explains his goal of helping the club 'to create some stability' has not changed and he believes the appointment of receivers 'may well be the catalyst to achieve this'.
He then defends the league's approach to the long-running crisis at Blackpool, writing that the league 'operates inside a regulatory framework...that provides the flexibility for the board to determine if a sporting sanction of a 12-point deduction is to be enforced'.
Underlining that the 12-point sanction is not mandatory, Harvey wrote: 'The board will need to consider, for example, whether the period of receivership delivers any reduction in the level of debt at the club that is not available to another club outside an insolvency process, and if the competitive balance of the division is impacted as a result of the appointment of the receiver.'
The EFL board's next meeting, Harvey added, is on March 6, when 'we will look to bring the matter to a conclusion, as quickly as possible'.