He is right that it is the minority and I don't condone the abuse but as far as results and performances go, the Covid excuse does not float as every opponent was affected in the same way.
Also, the threat to walk away before a new owner is found would be damaging for fans but there is no way that it would be in his financial interests either.
If any owner of any team willingly put it in to liquidation just to sell off its remaining asset(s) and pocket it themselves, it would be a first and he would be a pariah around the whole football world and beyond.
Scally could if driven out simply sell to the highest bidder regardless of their plans.He is right that it is the minority and I don't condone the abuse but as far as results and performances go, the Covid excuse does not float as every opponent was affected in the same way.
Also, the threat to walk away before a new owner is found would be damaging for fans but there is no way that it would be in his financial interests either.
If any owner of any team willingly put it in to liquidation just to sell off its remaining asset(s) and pocket it themselves, it would be a first and he would be a pariah around the whole football world and beyond.
I would imagine the terms of the loan are more to do with what you can do with cash rather than purely a limit on spending.He is right that driving him out would do us no good.
This loan limits our spending. My guess is that clubs are limited to spend net no more than last season. Logically Evans will keep looking a trialist and offer Akindie another chance of a chance to leave if and when we find another attacking player possibly a winger .That will of course mean that the players we already have like Carayol can be used more centrally.
I would imagine the terms of the loan are more to do with what you can do with cash rather than purely a limit on spending.
The loans are designed to keep clubs afloat that may otherwise struggle to survive. They are not there for clubs to splash it on having a stronger squad than they may otherwise had.
Scally could if driven out simply sell to the highest bidder regardless of their plans.
It's not nice to have people abusing you or chanting for you to go, but I do think Scally has become far too sensitive and defensive. It's all part of the same thing many of us have referred to over the years - he really needs some professional help with handling his PR and communications. Give me a call Paul!
It's tough at the top, seriously. Football chairmen can make most of the big decisions, lord it at matches and events and lap up the praise if an when it comes. Occasionally a Wembley moment lifts the owner to unimagined heights and the glow can last but we all know the other side of the coin, which is as grim as the upside is good. We have plenty of ultra loyal fans, plenty more thoroughly decent ones and fortunately far fewer ones capable of truly unpleasant behaviour.
It's easy for me to think that Scally should try to ignore, or at least downplay the nasty stuff but I don't have his job and I don't have to deal with it. The problem is that the more he protests, the less sympathy he is likely to attract. That's not all his fault more just how these things work. Most of us have made our own minds up about the more far out anti Scally views and somewhat share the views of the chairman, he should take comfort from that. Some time ago when Peter Taylor was manager Scally confided in fans at a meeting that his manager was overly affected by fans' negative opinions and they tried to shield him from them. Perhaps someone might do that for Scally, or he could learn to be more thick skinned via sessions with Mr Stimson because there is no future in inflating fools.
If you run a business, especially one as emotive as a local football club, with passionate fans, then a certain amount of flak will go with it.
However, the history of our club would have been very different over the last quarter century. I remember the dark days of 89-95 when for long periods we were probably the worst team in the league.
The alternative history could easily have been, gone bust, reformed in minor league football, tried to work our way back. Priestfield possibly sold off to pay debts.
It is very difficult to come back through non league football, we may not have made it back to the league by now, just look at some ex-league teams struggling, Hereford, Chester, Darlington, Chesterfield, York etc.
There would have been no Wemblies, no Fa cup 6th rounds no Championship football, no Hessenthalers, Asabas, or SBTs. No league football at all.
.
Without doing the research, I cannot be sure, but I suspect that the "plodders" - along with a handful of successes - have a Board of Directors that work as a team.
Does reaching the top tier require one, prominent individual - willing to take huge risks?
Do Bournemouth and Brentford fit that model - or a team approach?
Wise words, Jogills. I suppose the thing about PS is that he appears to be a very passionate person, especially when it comes to GFC. At some away games i`ve seen him visibly sink, in an emotional sense, when so called Gills fans have "sung" senseless garbage aimed directly at him.
I`m in the camp that feels PS cares very much about every aspect of the Football Club and he wants the best for GFC. Very few, if any, among us fans knows what goes on behind the boardroom door, which makes it very easy to criticise - for what it`s worth I trust PS to do the best job for GFC and its future.
You`re bang-on when you say "there is no future in inflating fools" but ignoring them at away games is becoming increasingly difficult - it was bad at some games the last season we were in stadia, it seems worse this time around.
It`s getting to the stage when the near-fights and scuffles between Gills fans become actual fights - i don`t want to see that, but it`s close to happening. It was at boiling point at Shrewsbury and if we are stuck in a small corner at Burton next week (instead of the open terracing) the cramped conditions will likely test the temperament of some.
Come on you blues.....