As an aside, totally disgusts me that an authority(tarian) organisation reacts with a sanction when, heaven forbid, someone dares to criticise or express an opinion from an authority. Whatever happened to "freedom of speech", or more reasonably or democratically, a reasoned and open debate, from both sides, to help EVERYONE understand a situation or decisions and perhaps to decide on a way forward which is acceptable to the majority. To not do so, and just react defensively, smacks of ignorance and fear of further criticism because the decision or course of action may have been wrong and could expose a short-sighted, ignorant 'bully mentality' of the organisation. Hate to say it, but (as a completely extreme comparison) the immediate thought which sprang to mind was those extreme authoritarian regimes around the World where people "disappeared" for daring to have a different view from 'the State'. I know they weren't allowed freedom of speech in those regimes, but the principles are not too far removed. Rant over ?