Ok, fair enough. I dont like being called racist, I would be worried about anyone who does but I accept that was not you
I don't actually disagree with any of that.
I traced my family in lockdown last year. I was hoping for some interesting stories, and what I got was a long line of brickmakers from Sleaford with a high child mortality rate. I can't trace back that far, but they would almost certainly have been serfs under the feudal system.
So no, it's not impossible that my family benefitted very indirectly from the slave trade through some pretty distant trickling down. But that can hardly be helped, and in reality my family had nothing at any time.
More importantly, the vast majority of the English population had no involvement in the slave trade and no agency to stop it. CP will say that is not good enough. I disagree. No one in my family had the ability to even vote until the 1880s reform act.
I don't believe it is wrong to question the extent of collective responsibiliy for evils committed by a regime in which a tiny elite ruled (MPs were not even paid until nearly the 20th century, ensuring only the elite could afford to be elected) and only a small portion of the population had any say in that.
I do not blame the Chinese population for what is happening to the Uighurs; what agency do they have? I have actually seen discrimination against the Uighurs in China with my own eyes, and the Chinese had no concept that it was discrimination. And why would they considering the information available to them?
I believe the same principal applies.
And finally, someone suggests a viable idea for his restitution could be done. I don't disagree with what you say there at all