Nobby_66
Vital Football Hero
Er, I used the word belief, speculation was your word, help me out hereScientists don't speculate; they may have theories but they have to be tested to death
Er, I used the word belief, speculation was your word, help me out hereScientists don't speculate; they may have theories but they have to be tested to death
Speculation by scientists
The theories I quoted above were those put forward by various scientists from around the world, I've never put them forward as fact, hence my use of the vague language. As I said at the end of my post "Truth is, no one seems to know a lot about it".The data simply hasn't been collected or published yet.
The theories I quoted above were those put forward by various scientists from around the world, I've never put them forward as fact, hence my use of the vague language. As I said at the end of my post "Truth is, no one seems to know a lot about it".
Call them theories, speculation, best guesses, all amounts to a lack of certainty which is what the whole post was about
Hope thats clearer
Yes, I'd also like to correct Wayne here.Our leader didn't go to Durham, obsessing over your personal dislikes only discredits your post.
Ah, at last, we have it. Just what the Government wanted. We now blame our own people. We are uniquely stupid and out of control.I went to the supermarket on Monday, I was the only person wearing gloves and mask and one of only a few trying to keep my distance. People in other countries seem to be able to think for themselves, we just complain what the government should be doing.
Ah, at last, we have it. Just what the Government wanted. We now blame our own people. We are uniquely stupid and out of control.
I've been thinking for a while that the Government needed a scapegoat and it is its own people.
These same stupid out of control people have just elected this government, so I suppose it makes sense in a way.
Just watched last night's Ch 4 Dispatches programme. How many deaths could Boris and his advisor(s) have avoided with an earlier lockdown 5,000 15,000 or 20,000. Take a look and judge for yourself.
https://www.channel4.com/programmes/coronavirus-did-the-government-get-it-wrong/on-demand/71453-001
Surely anyone sticking two fingers up and not complying because "I'm not being told what to do by Boris" is exactly the sort of person who didn't vote Conservative?Ah, at last, we have it. Just what the Government wanted. We now blame our own people. We are uniquely stupid and out of control.
I've been thinking for a while that the Government needed a scapegoat and it is its own people.
These same stupid out of control people have just elected this government, so I suppose it makes sense in a way.
If they are saying that it is probably since his mate went in tour and we had his risible Churchill imitation.Surely anyone sticking two fingers up and not complying because "I'm not being told what to do by Boris" is exactly the sort of person who didn't vote Conservative?
But how many deaths would have been caused by going into lockdown earller? It's a very difficult decision to make, not one I would like to have doneJust watched last night's Ch 4 Dispatches programme. How many deaths could Boris and his advisor(s) have avoided with an earlier lockdown 5,000 15,000 or 20,000. Take a look and judge for yourself.
https://www.channel4.com/programmes/coronavirus-did-the-government-get-it-wrong/on-demand/71453-001
But how many deaths would have been caused by going into lockdown earller? It's a very difficult decision to make, not one I would like to have done
We know that people have died because of lockdown, from non-covid reasons - we know that. People haven't been seeking medical advice or going to hospital with issues that they should have done. The earlier and longer we stay in lockdown to protect the sick and elderly, the worse it is for people that are not sick and elderly, and the more difficult it will be for the country to come back.That balance is pretty clear for having elected to lockdown a week or two earlier. Many lives in total would have been saved. I wouldn't like to be making the decisions but Johnson has made, and is continuing to make, some very poor calls.
Meaningless? Maybe but he does mention regionalism and, I would suggest, no more meaningless than just giving a national total with no allowance for regional populationsPretty meaningless unless comparisons are made with inner city/urban populations, for example.