Chairman Departs

Our Kids Dad said:
www.nottinghamforest.co.uk

Nottingham Forest announces transition of chairmanship

The Official Website of Nottingham Forest Football Club: get the latest news, highlights, fixtures and results, tickets and more.
www.nottinghamforest.co.uk www.nottinghamforest.co.uk

No loss whatsoever - still think he was responsible for the Everton tweet and had no connection with the fans.

Welcome back Nick Randall
Click to expand...
He was another self serving c * nt who filled his boots and then fucked off.

On the down side, bang goes my source of gossip at the Club
 
Let’s hope it wasn’t him who led to the calmest most sensible few months of Marinakis’ tenure
 
mao tse tung said:
I couldnt possibly divulge my sources, and I am sure you wouldnt want me to.
[/QUOTE No I wouldn't expect you to. It just surprises me that you think EM would tolerate ( or much worse perhaps) someone who has given him bad advice and ripped him off over the stadium development so far. Do you think EM is a fool?
Click to expand...
 
from day one i didn't like that appointment as figured he saw property development as profits rather than the club being better off as a club and what happened, tried to move our home. Now theres less profits from a new stadium and he does one.. shame.
Randall i figured walked cos of the finances and psr etc so now thats fixed then hopefully he can keep on top of it and not have to walk again
 
paz1967 said:
from day one i didn't like that appointment as figured he saw property development as profits rather than the club being better off as a club and what happened, tried to move our home. Now theres less profits from a new stadium and he does one.. shame.
Randall i figured walked cos of the finances and psr etc so now thats fixed then hopefully he can keep on top of it and not have to walk again
Click to expand...
So I'll repeat the question. Has he taken EM as a fool?
 
paz1967 said:
from day one i didn't like that appointment as figured he saw property development as profits rather than the club being better off as a club and what happened, tried to move our home. Now theres less profits from a new stadium and he does one.. shame.
Randall i figured walked cos of the finances and psr etc so now thats fixed then hopefully he can keep on top of it and not have to walk again
Click to expand...
Or, they know the development is going to proceed at the end of the season and given Benoy will be the firm offered the contract, Tom's departure is to ensure that everything is enabled their end to break ground next May.
 
jbacsta said:
So I'll repeat the question. Has he taken EM as a fool?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure how you have gotten to that point.

Why should it follow that EM has been taken for a fool?

You can look after your own interests without breaking the law; you can influence the decision making process so that you benefit, also without breaking the law.

I'm perfectly sure that at the time of his appointment the subject of conflict of interest would have been raised, most probably by Chairman Tom himself, if he is as smart as he claims he is - another bit of gossip.

I do not think he will go down as one of our more popular Chairmen, if what I have been told is in anyway true - offhand, dismissive, lacks empathy, and a few other remarks I would rather not repeat.
 
mao tse tung said:
I'm not sure how you have gotten to that point.

Why should it follow that EM has been taken for a fool?

You can look after your own interests without breaking the law; you can influence the decision making process so that you benefit, also without breaking the law.

I'm perfectly sure that at the time of his appointment the subject of conflict of interest would have been raised, most probably by Chairman Tom himself, if he is as smart as he claims he is - another bit of gossip.

I do not think he will go down as one of our more popular Chairmen, if what I have been told is in anyway true - offhand, dismissive, lacks empathy, and a few other remarks I would rather not repeat.
Click to expand...
Just that you give me the impression that you think Chairman Tom was looking after number 1 as a priority and the interests of EM and the club a bad second. If that was in fact the case EM has to a certain extent at least been taken for a fool by him.
 
jbacsta said:
Just that you give me the impression that you think Chairman Tom was looking after number 1 as a priority and the interests of EM and the club a bad second. If that was in fact the case EM has to a certain extent at least been taken for a fool by him.
Click to expand...
I'm guessing you take the view that if he comes from the World of Construction he must be OK.

That would not be a view shared by a lot of people outside of that industry.
 
mao tse tung said:
I'm guessing you take the view that if he comes from the World of Construction he must be OK.

That would not be a view shared by a lot of people outside of that industry.
Click to expand...
What a weird comment. I know plenty of people from my time in construction that I wouldn't piss on if they were on fire. I know nothing about him so have no opinion whatsoever, you on the other hand apparently know enough to prompt you to post derogatory comments about him on here. Completely OK with me if you are correct.
 
jbacsta said:
Just that you give me the impression that you think Chairman Tom was looking after number 1 as a priority and the interests of EM and the club a bad second. If that was in fact the case EM has to a certain extent at least been taken for a fool by him.
Click to expand...
i doubt if you appoint a shark that you are very surprised when it bites
 
jbacsta said:
What a weird comment. I know plenty of people from my time in construction that I wouldn't piss on if they were on fire. I know nothing about him so have no opinion whatsoever, you on the other hand apparently know enough to prompt you to post derogatory comments about him on here. Completely OK with me if you are correct.
Click to expand...
That saying is ridiculous isn’t it?

I wouldn’t piss on anyone if they were on fire. Firstly it’s a bit unnecessary considering the predicament the person is in to start with

And secondly you’d be more likely to melt your foreskin before the first drops of urine had hit the victim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.