Bye bye fat sam.

  • Thread starter Removed at own request
  • Start date
R

Removed at own request

Guest
Whilst it's not Spurs - it does affect us in a way.

http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37479135

He has got to go, but is anyone really shocked?
 
The guy is a prick for screwing up his England career!
Although I'm a little annoyed as I actually think he's prob one of the better options available to England right now and thought he was a big upgrade on Woy!

Oh well, on to the next...
 
WTF? He said it would need to be approved by the FA?

At least Clarke is waiting for all the facts. Naffing social media justice.
 
Greavswasthegreatest - 27/9/2016 14:26

If he is sacked he will be the only England manager ever with a 100% win ratio!
Click to expand...


That'll be a million dollar trivia question in 20 years.
 
80deg16minW - 27/9/2016 14:32

Greavswasthegreatest - 27/9/2016 14:26

If he is sacked he will be the only England manager ever with a 100% win ratio!
Click to expand...


That'll be a million dollar trivia question in 20 years.
Click to expand...

Well, the stack of brown envelopes in his wardrobe was going to come crashing down on him sometime.

Also it is karma for saying Rooney will play in the next world cup.
 
80deg16minW - 27/9/2016 11:47

WTF? He said it would need to be approved by the FA?

At least Clarke is waiting for all the facts. Naffing social media justice.
Click to expand...

I imagine it's more the loop holes in third party ownership is the issue.

He's got to go.
 
He earns what as England manager- £3 Million a year? Yet he seeks out a windfall at the side door only to be turned over by fake sheik types. What a dick-head; I hope the lard ass *** gets sacked! :2:
 
Kinygerbils - 27/9/2016 15:33

bielsa Needs to be considered
Click to expand...

Its one thing having overseas players prominent in your club side and or an overseas manager managing your club; but when a foreign manager manages your national side it's just as ludicrous as having the English national side field six Italians, four French men and a Scotsman up front. Get real :13:
 
Can't help but think this is another case of journalists going for the headline rather than carrying the undercover the full way.
 
Whatever I think of his actual appointment, what the feck did the Torygraph think it was achieving by getting rid of an England manager at this moment in time ?

Ah right, they're rugger buggers and sod the working mans game...
 
I'm no friend of the back stabbing hacks but having a go at them on this one is an abysmal position to take. Fat Sam is a money greedy wide boy and proven to be so; he will quite rightly get the boot tonight- there is absolutely no realistic other option here lest the FA accept that they are a laughing stock!
 
paddieu - 27/9/2016 19:25

Whatever I think of his actual appointment, what the feck did the Torygraph think it was achieving by getting rid of an England manager at this moment in time ?

Ah right, they're rugger buggers and sod the working mans game...
Click to expand...

I think you'll find that this investigation goes back almost a year and involves many "big names" in the game; but as that greedy fat git is the current England boss ofcoarse he had to headline.
 
BigBoxOffice - 27/9/2016 19:28

I'm no friend of the back stabbing hacks but having a go at them on this one is an abysmal position to take. Fat Sam is a money greedy wide boy and proven to be so; he will quite rightly get the boot tonight- there is absolutely no realistic other option here lest the FA accept that they are a laughing stock!
Click to expand...

Spot on.

Could of been avoided by him simply saying no.

 
Source ? I'd be interested to read that.

It's a red herring about 'he could have said no.'

Ask yourself what those doing it were hoping to achieve.

And just for the record I think he was a lousy appointment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.