Ben Davies the 'unsung' hero..

Spursex

Alert Team
Ben Davies showing Spurs the benefits of his Danish education


Ben Davies has been in sparkling form this season Credit: Reuters

Jonathan Liew, at the John Smith’s Stadium

1 October 2017 • 10:30pm

About 15 years ago, Alun Davies took a job in Denmark with a company that produces central heating pumps. And so Alun and his wife Eryl packed their bags and moved to a town called Viborg, taking their football-mad eight-year-old Ben with them.

Ben joined the local academy, and soon found himself getting a rare and valuable footballing education. During the harsh Danish winters, indoor football was the game of choice, with pristine artificial surfaces and an emphasis on control, passing and movement.

“It was a lot more technical and organised at that age,” Davies would later remember. “At that level I also found that the quality was better. It’s something they should do more here.”

Football’s origin stories can often become overly fixated on small details. Davies returned to Wales at the age of 11. But it is tempting to wonder whether he would have become the player he did if he had instead spent those years charging up and down the muddy pitches of his rugby-focused Swansea primary school.

In an important sense, that technical education, that ball craft, that thirst for learning, developing, exploring the outer reaches of his game, has never quite left him.
Ben Davies scores Tottenham's second goal on Saturday
Davies scored Tottenham's second goal on Saturday Credit: PA

To watch Davies against Huddersfield Town on Saturday was to be reminded of that. While most of the plaudits were reserved for Harry Kane and his two goals, Tottenham manager Mauricio Pochettino went out of his way to praise Davies, whose outstanding performance at left wing-back was another leap forward for one of English football’s most improved players. His goal and assist were his third of each in his last nine matches.

“For me, he is one of the best full-backs in the Premier League,” Pochettino said. “The performance was fantastic. OK, Harry Kane, but Ben was also one of the best on the pitch in defending and attacking. His energy is fantastic.”

Davies has been at Tottenham for three years now, and until the start of this season would have been nobody’s idea of a footballing icon. His interviews are measured to the point of tedium. Danny Rose has long been recognised as the first choice in his position. Spurs fans do not even have a song for him. But all the while, Davies was building, maturing, sharpening to a point.

They always used to talk about his capacity for learning at Swansea, combining a youth team career with studying for his A-Levels. On the Tottenham bus, he can often be seen with his nose buried in a book. That unwavering commitment to self-improvement has been one of the constants in his career.


Yet to make a player better, you need the right environment as well as the right individual. And in Pochettino, Davies has found the perfect sensei: a coach who recognises that while players perform on a Saturday, they develop during the rest of the week.

“He’s worked so hard to get to this moment,” Pochettino said. “He’s always been professional, and that is why the club are so proud of him.”

Under Pochettino’s relentless fitness regime, Davies has shed fat and added muscle. Tactically, he has adapted his game to the demands of the wing-back role, becoming more clinical in the final third, finishing chances as well as creating them.

Now, with Rose poised to return from injury in the next few weeks, and the fallout from his recent comments on the club’s pay structure still simmering, it is no longer clear who Tottenham’s first-choice left-back is.

Over the last three seasons, Tottenham’s win percentage with Rose in the team has been 44 per cent. With Davies - and the caveat that he has featured less in big games - it is 66 per cent. It is a delightful headache for Pochettino to have.

But in a way, the real moral of this story has a wider relevance, in a game ever more shrilly geared towards the instant judgement, the overnight success, the “statement” signing. The idea that you can simply improve a player rather than signing a new one feels almost quaint these days.

And yet from the heated halls of Denmark to the space-age training pitches of Enfield, Davies is living proof that if you are willing to learn, life has no limits.
 
A couple of things struck me about the article, it confirms my belief and that which I've argued for years that the FA should be building/investing in indoor pitches for youth development all over the country - leaving it to academies to only do it is a massive error of judgement...and will continue to hamper the development of technical skills for generations to come unless we realise that getting kids to play on shite surfaces for much of the year isn't going to help develop them.

...and secondly, this is a well placed article by a friend of Spurs and is of course softening us up (if any is needed) for the inevitable sale of Danny...

thirdly; it's good to see Ben getting some of the limelight, I never ever thought he'd end up competing and perhaps even bettering Danny, but he seems to be doing just that - amazing what a run of competitive game will do for a young player.
 
Rose is an exciting player but even if he gets back in I think there will be rotation and then probably another injury to Rose.
 
Davies is getting better but, right now,l who would you rather have in your team? A fit Rose or a fit Davies?

For absolute sure, we are all being warmed up for the sale of Rose.
 
Bald Archie - 2/10/2017 21:23

Davies is getting better but, right now,l who would you rather have in your team? A fit Rose or a fit Davies?

For absolute sure, we are all being warmed up for the sale of Rose.

A mercenary or a committed player? Easy option, it's not even like they are miles apart in talent. I honestly am not bothered if/when we sell Rose. If we can get in Sessegnon as his replacement we ain't done bad and we wouldn't be any weaker IMO.
 
ScottDaYid - 2/10/2017 21:55

Bald Archie - 2/10/2017 21:23

Davies is getting better but, right now,l who would you rather have in your team? A fit Rose or a fit Davies?

For absolute sure, we are all being warmed up for the sale of Rose.

A mercenary or a committed player? Easy option, it's not even like they are miles apart in talent. I honestly am not bothered if/when we sell Rose. If we can get in Sessegnon as his replacement we ain't done bad and we wouldn't be any weaker IMO.

The thing with Rose is that after every injury it takes him anywhere between 6-10 games to get back to his best as well; injuries take their toll (just look at how WILSHERE has been struggling for so long now).

I hope he proves me wrong this time when he comes back, but I bet he doesn't - so if we can sell him in Jan and get a silly number for him, we should.
 
Whilst it is true that we don't know whether Rose will be the player he was, taking that number of games to get back to fitness isn't exactly incommon. If it takes him that long and then he is what he was before, that it better than Davies. How long did it take Davies to start to look a worthy stand-in, and how will he do against a top side with pace? How long would it take him to return if he got injured?

To my mind all this desire to talk-up Davies and blithely call for the sale of Rose is simply a demonstration of knuckle dragging tribalism - he came out and said a few uncomfortable home truths, so is therefore a **** and has to be sold.
 
I can't remember what Rose said now but didn't he moan he wasn't earning as much as he could even though he hasn't kicked a ball in nearly a year? The timing was pretty crap as well.
 
He did say that which doesn't upset me at all but, to paraphrase, he also said that we needed to sign good enough players to win things. He is ambitious and all players should be.
 
If you were off work for 6 months would you be blabbing to your work colleagues about deserving a pay rise?

Some of what he said was spot on, and some of it was fair enough. However the timing was shocking and he had some cheek saying some of the things he did.

He was just pissed his best buddy is earning treble what he does.
 
That Walker had moved and tripled (or whatever) his money was a major factor in his interview of course, but what he said wasn't just about his money was it? It was after another season of flattering to decive when with bteer management we should have won something, his own injury frustraction and that, at that time, we weren't exactly setting the world alight in improving the squad - in fact we had just weakened it.

It i just how we see things - I don't hold anything against him for coming out with that in the same way I don't hold anything against Redknapp wanting to manage England. Been a Spurs fan all my life but not in me to switch from love to hate because a player / manager of the club wants something different. They have to be a two-faced coward like Campbell to string everyone along with lies, to get my hatred kicking in.
 
Bald Archie - 3/10/2017 19:36

Whilst it is true that we don't know whether Rose will be the player he was, taking that number of games to get back to fitness isn't exactly incommon. If it takes him that long and then he is what he was before, that it better than Davies. How long did it take Davies to start to look a worthy stand-in, and how will he do against a top side with pace? How long would it take him to return if he got injured?

To my mind all this desire to talk-up Davies and blithely call for the sale of Rose is simply a demonstration of knuckle dragging tribalism - he came out and said a few uncomfortable home truths, so is therefore a **** and has to be sold.

Your bias and prejudice pervades almost every single post you make; it also amply magnifys your complete lack of insight.

Rose's recovery post injury is a matter of record, but this time the injury is so serious it may well be 6 months to a year before he's anywhere near his best.

Poch has done a magnificent job building a team ethic and ethos, we have never had a squad so together according to none other that Graham Roberts (and he should know) and just about every single legand at the club, even Ledley says he's never felt or seen such a together positive atmosphere as Po;ch has built now.

It has been one of the biggest improvements made at Spurs and one never even remotely achieved by any manager in recent memory.

Selling Rose is a pragmatic decision, and nothing to do with Tribalism (except in your blinkered warped view) the nature of his knee injury is such that he may never reach the heights again - we had the same sort of ridiculous dumb comments being made when we sold Sandro - when to anyone who'd ever played the game at any level knew that the chances are he'd never ever be the same again - and he wasn't and still isn't.

But even beyond just the physical, Rose has made himself look an absolute self-centered tool - there is a very clear way to raise an issue, especially one of pay - the procedures and processes for doing so are embedded in every single contract and known off by heart by every single agent; he could have just let his agent have a cripe in public (as most sensible players do), but he choose to be a loud mouth and purposely undermine the great (according to him) relationship he says he now has with Poch - a coach he credits much of his improvement to.

So he wilfully risked the team ethic to speak out in public; he made himself and his agent look utterly stupid., but beyond all that his timing was designed to undermine the club and was a piece of theater that was entirely unnecessary.

These things hurt performances.

He made it clear he wanted out, so now let's just hope that there is still a 'Northern club' that wants to take that £50-60 mill gamble.

In future, try thinking first before you post such utter nonsense.
 
Not sure how playing our backup LB when the starter is injured for so long is an indication for Rose's departure.

That said, the only thing Rose has on Davies is the speed, which unfortunately for Davies is a huge limiting factor.
 
Pollo - 4/10/2017 12:40

Not sure how playing our backup LB when the starter is injured for so long is an indication for Rose's departure.

That said, the only thing Rose has on Davies is the speed, which unfortunately for Davies is a huge limiting factor.

We've adjusted, so few seem to have noticed that in recent games we're playing more direct (the heat maps tell the tale) and we're doing less sideways/backwards passing, but are now recycling quicker, looking for the gaps to move into and hitting long diagonals - Toby is almost become a master in providing them to Ben and Verts to Trips.
 
Also I think Sanchez helps our back line so the full backs aren't as concerned about being caught too far forward. Obviously they still need to track back and defend, but if there's a ball into a corner it seems like it's Sanchez job to chase it down rather than the full backs job to run nearly the full length of the pitch. Jan and Toby are joining in attacks more often too.
 
freundorfoe - 4/10/2017 13:44

Also I think Sanchez helps our back line so the full backs aren't as concerned about being caught too far forward. Obviously they still need to track back and defend, but if there's a ball into a corner it seems like it's Sanchez job to chase it down rather than the full backs job to run nearly the full length of the pitch. Jan and Toby are joining in attacks more often too.

yep, you can see it to - still needs some tweaking and I think it will be better when Aurier is properly fit, as well as Wany back in the middle ahead of Dier, as his screening is generally much better.
 
Spursex - 4/10/2017 12:36

Bald Archie - 3/10/2017 19:36

Whilst it is true that we don't know whether Rose will be the player he was, taking that number of games to get back to fitness isn't exactly incommon. If it takes him that long and then he is what he was before, that it better than Davies. How long did it take Davies to start to look a worthy stand-in, and how will he do against a top side with pace? How long would it take him to return if he got injured?

To my mind all this desire to talk-up Davies and blithely call for the sale of Rose is simply a demonstration of knuckle dragging tribalism - he came out and said a few uncomfortable home truths, so is therefore a **** and has to be sold.

Your bias and prejudice pervades almost every single post you make; it also amply magnifys your complete lack of insight.

Rose's recovery post injury is a matter of record, but this time the injury is so serious it may well be 6 months to a year before he's anywhere near his best.

Poch has done a magnificent job building a team ethic and ethos, we have never had a squad so together according to none other that Graham Roberts (and he should know) and just about every single legand at the club, even Ledley says he's never felt or seen such a together positive atmosphere as Po;ch has built now.

It has been one of the biggest improvements made at Spurs and one never even remotely achieved by any manager in recent memory.

Selling Rose is a pragmatic decision, and nothing to do with Tribalism (except in your blinkered warped view) the nature of his knee injury is such that he may never reach the heights again - we had the same sort of ridiculous dumb comments being made when we sold Sandro - when to anyone who'd ever played the game at any level knew that the chances are he'd never ever be the same again - and he wasn't and still isn't.

But even beyond just the physical, Rose has made himself look an absolute self-centered tool - there is a very clear way to raise an issue, especially one of pay - the procedures and processes for doing so are embedded in every single contract and known off by heart by every single agent; he could have just let his agent have a cripe in public (as most sensible players do), but he choose to be a loud mouth and purposely undermine the great (according to him) relationship he says he now has with Poch - a coach he credits much of his improvement to.

So he wilfully risked the team ethic to speak out in public; he made himself and his agent look utterly stupid., but beyond all that his timing was designed to undermine the club and was a piece of theater that was entirely unnecessary.

These things hurt performances.

He made it clear he wanted out, so now let's just hope that there is still a 'Northern club' that wants to take that £50-60 mill gamble.

In future, try thinking first before you post such utter nonsense.

Yawnnnn...........another of your bile laden posts because you don't like what I say.
 
From memory I think Rose apologised and Poch basically wanted to brush it aside and move on. Rose may have taken bad advice. I hope we can move on, Rose recovers and he stays. He was a silly boy but people say silly things even if they are highly intelligent. Boris being an example.