"Asylum seekers" go home willingly

  • Thread starter Villan Of The North
  • Start date
V

Villan Of The North

Guest
This is just a google translation of the article, I don't have time to do a proper one right now.

Rather than Somalia Vadso
HANNE TOLGA 11.26.2014 kl. 12.00
68 asylum seekers in Vadsø give up and return home voluntarily. That asylum seekers decide to travel back to the country they fled from suggesting that they were not as persecuted as they would have it. The vast majority are of course economic refugees who hope for a better life in.............

Click here to read the full translation

Here is the link to the original:-

https://www.document.no/2014/11/heller-somalia-enn-vadso/

 
Stick them in Small Heath for a few weeks and most would walk to the fucking airport.
 
Pride of Lions - 21/5/2015 10:18

col8 - 21/5/2015 17:13

Stick them in Small Heath for a few weeks and most would walk to the fucking airport.
Click to expand...




:1: :1: :1: :1: :1:
Click to expand...
:1: :1: :19: :19: :19: :19: True en all :19:

I think this is one of the most challenging issues we face as human beings, on one hand you got our own concerns in this economic climate and all the worry of the NHS housing etc but you can't help think its a shame that these people would go to such lenths and basically prepared to die to escape there countries to get into other countries to try and have some form of life,,,,,,i struggle cos my heart tells me its a crying shame for these people and they am human beings as we all am, but my head says we can't keep letting people in in droves,,,, :16:
 
Clearly there are many that are not i danger in their own countries Clive, they are claiming asylum but in reality are economic migrants. Asylum and migrancy for other reasons are 2 very different things, the problem is that once asylum seekers arrive they are not kept track of and just disappear into the population. Also, asylum seekers are often treated better in terms of the welfare state (as genuine applicants should be) so when you find out what is possible, only a fool or someone with integrity would not apply for asylum.

The simple solution, that many lefties and do-gooders disagree with, is to set up camps (disused military bases could be used, they have lots of space and a good amount of existing housing, not to mention shops on the US ones) that provides a safe place to live with reasonable standards - they should then not be allowed to leave until processed - if they are processed and allowed to stay then they become legal immigrants, the others would be sent back.

 
Hey i think that is some part of the solution and a good idea tbh VOTN dude, at least then we would know for a fact the numbers coming here and into society and manage the numbers,,but still once we get to numbers being too many how would we stop it,,,,same problem tbh, but i get the concept (posh word) of your idea VOTN dude.
 
Contrary to what most would do, I'd also increase foreign aid but I'd insist on being part of the administration of the funds so that there is complete transparency. I believe it's better to improve people's lives where they are than to bring them to an already overcrowded island in the north Atlantic. In the long term it would be much cheaper too as it would improve the local infrastructure which would entice more people to stay. This would, over a period of time, reduce the asylum seekers to those that genuinely are in danger, the people for whom the system was set up and, major wars aside, should be manageable in number.

 
VOTN dude by now no human being should not have access to clean water to ffs ay, something has gone seriously wrong with the amount we in the west am supposed to have sent over the past decade etc, homes water food basic needs yet folk am starving???? I don't see us sending more money working, somebody will always somehow intercept it or the goods imo, we could have like a special force ovber in countrues UN type that build infrastructure a bit like the romans did and set up countries starting them off then the money would be used
 
ClivetheVillan - 21/5/2015 13:08

VOTN dude by now no human being should not have access to clean water to ffs ay, something has gone seriously wrong with the amount we in the west am supposed to have sent over the past decade etc, homes water food basic needs yet folk am starving???? I don't see us sending more money working, somebody will always somehow intercept it or the goods imo,
Click to expand...

This is why I wrote

I'd insist on being part of the administration of the funds so that there is complete transparency
Click to expand...

ClivetheVillan - 21/5/2015 13:08

we could have like a special force ovber in countrues UN type that build infrastructure a bit like the romans did and set up countries starting them off then the money would be used
Click to expand...

Which is really just an expensive version of my suggestion. I don't see the need to make things more expensive by using British labour when local labour would be much cheaper and they would have a vested interest in doing it properly. The issue is making sure it's administrated properly and not absorbed into the coffers of the corrupt.

 
I think yam talking sense mate and greatful you pointed out what you said again and now i get it hehehe, but seriously this is why your idea won't work cos it would work, why i just dunno
 
I think he's probably referring to this

[youtube=mUP3A9imOYU]


 
You must log in or register to reply here.