OneSirKeefy
Vital Football Hero
You definitely shouldn't bother mate. You've admitted you don't know why - and that's fine. Its just a shame it took you being arrogant, and me to explain it about 5 times to get there.
It was a simple polite question originally open to anyone really not just yourself, as I just found it an odd rule. It's ended up with you patroninsing and arrogantly responding to me which is hilariously ironic because up until your last post it's actually you are the one who's missed the point of my questions.
I said in my very first post to you -
“The reasoning is, that a workplace has provided alcohol. If people then drive and have an accident, there is blame apportioned to the workplace. They have to provide transport of some variety and do all they can to ensure employees do not drink drive. The burden of proof is on them to show they did everything they could.”
That’s the WHY. It’s been there from the very start. You may or may not agree with it, but that’s the “why” the laws are there. And other than that I don’t know why the laws are made.
I’ve just seen as well that in your first reply to me you said “we don’t have those laws in UK”. You might want to check again the link I put there.
It’s why I feel like I’m hitting my head against a brick wall.
I’m also struggling to see anywhere that I’ve been arrogant in any of my replies. There’s been a ton of arrogance and patronising in yours.
Off to get ready for the game now.