ThreeSixes
Vital Football Hero
I know Iranians who came over in 70’s when they were kids and never went back.
That's 50 years ago, so it's permanent really. That is why so many people (500 a day) are coming to the UK
I know Iranians who came over in 70’s when they were kids and never went back.
Is that the test then, "largely assimilated themselves into UK culture"? The middle class dentist who turns out for the local cricket team can stay, the lower class taxi driver who marries within his own community and goes to the mosque can go?
Asylum should be temporary. If you fled Iraq because Saddam Hussein, you should havr gone back to Iraq when he went. If you don't, it's clearly not Asylum
Iraq post Saddam was far more dangerous than it was when he was in charge.
There is a fantastic series called once upon a time in iraq. Well worth a watch. We (the west) totally screwed it up and people suffered and it won't be safe for people to return and rebuild their lives for a very long time. Just like Libya, Syria and now Afghanistan.
Well worth a watch. It was on iplayer and is on you tube as well
(123) Frontline | Once Upon A Time In Iraq | Preview - YouTube
I also watched it Mark.Iraq post Saddam was far more dangerous than it was when he was in charge.
There is a fantastic series called once upon a time in iraq. Well worth a watch. We (the west) totally screwed it up and people suffered and it won't be safe for people to return and rebuild their lives for a very long time. Just like Libya, Syria and now Afghanistan.
Well worth a watch. It was on iplayer and is on you tube as well
(123) Frontline | Once Upon A Time In Iraq | Preview - YouTube
when the French declined to join in with the post 9/11 stuff the US told then 'it will a long time before the US forgives you'.
the French minister replied 'and it will be a long time before the world forgives you' lol.
Interesting. Afghans that are fleeing to the West MUST be told that Western Imperialism is responsible for their predicament. If they knew the truth, they wouldn't want to come here or stay here."John Pilger on the takeover of the Taliban in Afghanistan. He calls the US military a killing machine and discusses why the Afghanistan War must be viewed through the lens of Western imperialism, the scale of civilian casualties and destruction of Afghanistan by NATO countries, how the US created today’s situation by supporting Afghan jihadist forces against the Soviet Union throughout the Cold War, the social progress and progressive reform lost to history with the fall of the Soviet-backed PDPA government in Afghanistan..."
Interesting. Afghans that are fleeing to the West MUST be told that Western Imperialism is responsible for their predicament. If they knew the truth, they wouldn't want to come here or stay here.
Those who just want a normal life with education, safety and a brighter future for their kids might.
Wouldn't we ?
Had WW2 gone differently do you think our grandparents may have looked to flee to places like North America?
Had WW2 gone differently do you think our grandparents may have looked to flee to places like North America?
No, it would be the equivalent of fleeing to Germany, Italy or Japan after ww2. North America were our allies.
Yes, we want our children to be safe and educated. What is it that is stopping children being educated in other countries? Religions. And what is making its way over here? Religions
You'd need to have kids to be worried about your kids. If the individuals currently arriving do have families, they have been left behind
I think there's a case for saying that the French have showed how to do it in the Sahel. Be a lot less ambitious in what you want to achieve and what you are prepared to commit. Be a lot less choosy about who you back. It's still the road to nowhere in terms of progress, but the road to nowhere is better than a cliff and you can always hope that things change or something turns up.
The English seem to be held to higher standards than other countries in most historical areas.In your first point I'm reading that as you are making an assumption that all Afghans saw us as their enemies. I am sure many Afghans would have been perfectly happy to have led a more western way of life and therefore coming to us would be seen as coming to their allies. The "once upon a time in iraq" programme starts with Iraqi teens appearing on a TV link up (before the war) with US kids - they were excited to talk about western things.
I don't disagree that Religion can be the cause of so much conflict. With respect to those with religious beliefs on here I think a world without it would be a better world..
On your last points my only explanation is that they can only afford for one person to make the journey. The hope is they make and build a safe home to invite their families over to join (legally). when I see footage of young kids in the boats in the Med or the Channel and then think what horrors are they leaving to risk that. As a father I find that hard to get my head around.
Why here ? Why not Italy, France or somewhere else ? My only answer is English is a world wide language. They probably believe it will be easier if they can speak the basics.
OK, re the first paragraph, that was kind of my point in my post. Gilles Lingham seems to think this is all the fault of the West, the Afghans themselves don't seem to be sure. If he is right, which I'm sure he is, the Afghans need to be educated.In your first point I'm reading that as you are making an assumption that all Afghans saw us as their enemies. I am sure many Afghans would have been perfectly happy to have led a more western way of life and therefore coming to us would be seen as coming to their allies. The "once upon a time in iraq" programme starts with Iraqi teens appearing on a TV link up (before the war) with US kids - they were excited to talk about western things.
I don't disagree that Religion can be the cause of so much conflict. With respect to those with religious beliefs on here I think a world without it would be a better world..
On your last points my only explanation is that they can only afford for one person to make the journey. The hope is they make and build a safe home to invite their families over to join (legally). when I see footage of young kids in the boats in the Med or the Channel and then think what horrors are they leaving to risk that. As a father I find that hard to get my head around.
Why here ? Why not Italy, France or somewhere else ? My only answer is English is a world wide language. They probably believe it will be easier if they can speak the basics.
OK, re the first paragraph, that was kind of my point in my post. Gilles Lingham seems to think this is all the fault of the West, the Afghans themselves don't seem to be sure. If he is right, which I'm sure he is, the Afghans need to be educated.
Re the other points, I know this is going over old ground, but if someone is crossing the channel, they are leaving from France. And it's 22 miles, you can literally see France from Dover - they aren't going round the Cape of Good Hope.
And they are not leving horrors behind, they are bringing them with them. Do you really think the men on the boats, from Africa, South Asia and the Middle East are the oppressed? If someone is oppressed in Eritrea or Afghanistan then they will still be in Eritrea or Afghanistan, uneducated, underfed and poor.