kefkat - 2/3/2015 12:56
HeathfieldRoad1874 - 2/3/2015 12:27
The reason you recovered is that you stuck with the program. Those it doesn't suit, or don't want to believe they are powerless, get no help, and the messages they are left with can be deeply scarring.
You were lucky, kk. You were one of the 5%. That leaves 95% not being helped, and a good proportion of those do recover through other methods. There are those, however, that become worse after AA, due to being told they can't recover unless they finish the 12 steps. Obviously, that is nonsense, because many people recover without them.
Are you seriously telling me that if you were presented with a more effective method of helping people, you would ignore it? You are that entrenched in the 12 step program?
I don't ignore anything Heath. Through what I do I get to help 100's and 100's of people in more than just addiction.
Ofcourse I would listen to it. Indeed we work with services that have different approaches. I am entrenched in 12 step (I would be after 12 years in 3 weeks of sobriety) however yes I have been blessed, with the fact of who has been around me, who has come into my life. The 12 steps are tool not to be taken as literally as some say.
As you know Heath, I am interpretational with everything so the same applies here.
I have no issue with people finding different ways. Knowing our literature as I do, it says in the preface for example, in The Big Book, this book is written by a 100 men and women who have recovered from a hopeless state of mind and body.
It also says that 'we don't say we are the only way' in the literature. it also says 'that other agencies have there place'
The problem is like anything people change things, that are said, whether that is through perception or whatever. That is what happens when people are involved.
The 1 thing with AA is that people their talk differently with different people within the rooms. It depends on whom they talk with and that person perception and what is said, to what you hear.
Though that is a problem there are those of us if we know who can put it right.
At 1 time, you may not know there was an anti AA thing in The U.K. That is because in 1997 the new government wanted to get involved in AA and as our traditions state we do not affiliate (anyway who the heck would want the government involved in anything)
So the government went off and set up all kinds of things and preached anti us. It took them about 10 years to realize what they were doing wasn't working and 'ah boo AA is free' It costs them nothing.
That is why (although we always have) we cooperate more and more with professionals, agencies and services, as especially in these cost cutting times, we do what they can't.
It has been decided through many years that people (whatever the illness) get better in groups. Resources can last only so long. AA is seen as an aftercare facility.
I am also an independent on a umbrella network forum in York working for the good of those to come in recovery. This is how the agencies and communities work together to bring life and activities to those coming or are in recovery.
I don't just do AA to help people with their issues. I don't care how someone gets well as long as they get well. If they come to AA and it works fantastic. If they don't they don't and they find another way that is fine by me. I work along side some who don't do AA. We all have the same goal (or should do) and that is to see people get well.
I know the no's aren't big who get well in AA. People do get well other ways. Unfortunately it is an illness, where more than, however people get well, don't ever recover for whatever reason.