A question for Rosie about religion | Page 28 | Vital Football

A question for Rosie about religion

  • Thread starter Villan Of The North
  • Start date
HeathfieldRoad1874 - 26/6/2013 09:32

Did you read the Book that Kiwi posted? It also confirms that many people and places mentioned in the Bible existed, and that some events did happen. That does not itself prove the Bible is an absolute truth, just that facts are woven into it.

When do you think the dating in the Bible is correct?


I refer you back to my post yesterday. You need to be addressing the issues raised that do not correspond with Biblical history, not the ones that do. Is that so hard to understand?

For example, do you believe that Moses wrote the first 5 Books of the OT? Do you believe he was born in 1525 BC? And hence he wrote these books prior to 1400 BC?
 
Green Tea - 27/6/2013 12:36



The thing is Heath, you can type in as many searches as you like and you can get 1000's of articles on one subject - all written by any Tom, Dick and Harry.

This line did make me chuckle. There was something you posted a few pages back where you prevaricated about Moses being a real person and I thought for a second, Oh shit, this guy is trolling. Please tell me you're trolling because it's the greatest troll ever if you are.
 
I have a book that describes the 1939-1945 war, the 1914-1918 war and also the life and death of Winston churchill, it also talks about the dragons that took over the planet on the 9th april 1962 and how they destroyed the population of China and turned everyone in alabama orange.

some of the stories in that book are or real actual events, some of them are just plain bullshit.

Moral of the story, just because an ancient book gets a couple of things right (literally a couple of things) doesnt mean everything written in it should be taken as fact.

This is a very much simplified version of your ridiculous point of view.

 
This is an interesting piece - Mammals co'-existing with Dinosaurs;

The discovery of a small furry beast from the Jurassic era has given scientists fresh insights into the evolution of the first mammals on Earth. The fossilised remains of the squirrel-sized animal that plodded rather than scampered, came from rock dated to 165m years ago, when feathered dinosaurs shared the land.

Named Megaconus, or "large cusp", after its distinctive teeth, the animal was unearthed in Inner Mongolia where it had been preserved in volcanic ash that settled in a freshwater lake. It is thought to be an early relative of mammals, and has some mammalian features, while others are more commonly seen in reptiles.

Preserved among the remnants is evidence of fur and a keratinous spur that jutted from the hind ankle and was probably used to deliver poison to predators. The bones of its middle ear were more primitive, and attached to the jaw as in reptiles. The discovery shows that animals evolved to have fur before the first true mammals emerged. The fur was primarily for insulation, but may also have served a sensory purpose.

The animal belongs to a group called the haramiyids, whose existence was previously based on the scant fossil evidence of isolated teeth. Megaconus had long, rodent-like teeth able to chew plants and munch on insects and worms.

"The teeth have been studied since the 19th century, but nobody had an idea what these animals looked like," said Thomas Martin, a scientist on the team at the University of Bonn.

Details of the discovery are reported in the journal Nature.

Martin said the warm-blooded animal foraged at night and lived on the shores of the shallow freshwater lake where its remains were eventually recovered 165m years later.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/aug/07/jurassic-squirrel-mammals-evolution-earth

 
Gazgecko - 3/7/2013 11:18

Kiwivillan - 27/6/2013 22:44

Pfffft next you'll be saying Abraham Lincoln didn't kill vampires.

He DID kill vampires. He didn't have a clue about zombies though...

oh for sure he did. There is video proof of that, saw it the other week on sky.
 
Green Tea - 9/8/2013 13:13

This is an interesting piece - Mammals co'-existing with Dinosaurs;

The discovery of a small furry beast from the Jurassic era has given scientists fresh insights into the evolution of the first mammals on Earth. The fossilised remains of the squirrel-sized animal that plodded rather than scampered, came from rock dated to 165m years ago, when feathered dinosaurs shared the land.

Named Megaconus, or "large cusp", after its distinctive teeth, the animal was unearthed in Inner Mongolia where it had been preserved in volcanic ash that settled in a freshwater lake. It is thought to be an early relative of mammals, and has some mammalian features, while others are more commonly seen in reptiles.

Preserved among the remnants is evidence of fur and a keratinous spur that jutted from the hind ankle and was probably used to deliver poison to predators. The bones of its middle ear were more primitive, and attached to the jaw as in reptiles. The discovery shows that animals evolved to have fur before the first true mammals emerged. The fur was primarily for insulation, but may also have served a sensory purpose.

The animal belongs to a group called the haramiyids, whose existence was previously based on the scant fossil evidence of isolated teeth. Megaconus had long, rodent-like teeth able to chew plants and munch on insects and worms.

"The teeth have been studied since the 19th century, but nobody had an idea what these animals looked like," said Thomas Martin, a scientist on the team at the University of Bonn.

Details of the discovery are reported in the journal Nature.

Martin said the warm-blooded animal foraged at night and lived on the shores of the shallow freshwater lake where its remains were eventually recovered 165m years later.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/aug/07/jurassic-squirrel-mammals-evolution-earth

One hundred and sixty five million years ago.

Or.....One hundred and sixty four million, nine hundred and ninety thousand years before you say the earth was created.