@Thewolf/jimmygordon you've made up a toxic narrative in your own head, just to be unhappy about. That's on you chap. Pretty much everyone who is unhappy with our managerial situation acknowledges that best case scenario is Ange wins games and we do well under him, and everyone would be happy with that. You're making out it's a "toxic" campaign against Ange just because we don't like him and it's unjustified and unfair. We're being spoiled brats because we don't like the perfectly capable manager who we've got.
Nobody wants Ange to leave the club purely because of who he is, or what his name is, or where he was before. The people who are unhappy with him, were unhappy with the original appointment, and are unhappy with current results have been unhappy based purely on football reasons. He hasn't done anything to disabuse those notions that he isn't the right man for the job. In fact, he's done so badly he's absolutely reinforced those initial concerns and then some.
I've yet to see you present a coherent footballing argument as to why you think Ange Postecoglou deserves more time and will turn results around at Nottingham Forest. I don't want "because 7 games isn't long enough". That's not a footballing reason to justify his appointment or position. In Premier League terms, with his Premier League record, what are the reasons for having Ange Postecoglou as manager? Where in his past achievements do we have a valid reason to believe he can turn around a Premier League team in Premier League fixtures given time to do so?
This is not on the fans. The fans didn't make this appointment, but they can see the colossal balls up that has been made. Why would we, as fans who want the best for our club, sit silently and passively watching a manager who is so clearly wrong for the club take us to relegation? Is that your idea of being a fan? I'm generally a supportive fan who gives more benefit of the doubt than many, but I can't find any reason or justification for it in this scenario.