danvilla2
I’m not an expert
I do agree with col8’s point about subconscious bias towards the “big 6” (usually caveat hate that term).
If the big 6 win a penalty with VAR checking , I’d be fairly sure deep in the heads of a useless VAR referee would be to “confirm if penalty can be given to Big 6 team” or conversely, if a penalty goes against a Big 6 team the head of the red is thinking “does opposition team deserve penalty”. To relate to yesterday in the two scenarios, “was Pogba fouled” or if it had been the other way “did jack fall over”.
When Liverpool were storming ahead last season, every goal they conceded was being checked and by checking every goal you can usually find some violation if you play the tape long enough.
What I’ve scenario’d above is very different from a completely objective view.
In my industry there’s a good phrase that goes “win the draws”. What that means, is that when it’s 50:50 it goes your way - which is what happened to United. Whereas if that was jack being fouled by a Matic type, we wouldn’t have had the decision.
If you think 1 in every 3 games has a controversial VAR decision, that’s a lot of decisions going to the favour of the Liverpool’s, Uniteds, Spurs’ etc over us. VAR is a huge handicap for us as much as it was designed to bring more objectivity into the game, I genuinely believe it’s made it worse.
The technology is two decades off working and the reality is if anyone is going to bring in real time and instant decision from such technology it’s going to be the Germans or the Japanese, not the FA using Microsoft bloody paint to draw on dodgy lines in a picture frame.
If the big 6 win a penalty with VAR checking , I’d be fairly sure deep in the heads of a useless VAR referee would be to “confirm if penalty can be given to Big 6 team” or conversely, if a penalty goes against a Big 6 team the head of the red is thinking “does opposition team deserve penalty”. To relate to yesterday in the two scenarios, “was Pogba fouled” or if it had been the other way “did jack fall over”.
When Liverpool were storming ahead last season, every goal they conceded was being checked and by checking every goal you can usually find some violation if you play the tape long enough.
What I’ve scenario’d above is very different from a completely objective view.
In my industry there’s a good phrase that goes “win the draws”. What that means, is that when it’s 50:50 it goes your way - which is what happened to United. Whereas if that was jack being fouled by a Matic type, we wouldn’t have had the decision.
If you think 1 in every 3 games has a controversial VAR decision, that’s a lot of decisions going to the favour of the Liverpool’s, Uniteds, Spurs’ etc over us. VAR is a huge handicap for us as much as it was designed to bring more objectivity into the game, I genuinely believe it’s made it worse.
The technology is two decades off working and the reality is if anyone is going to bring in real time and instant decision from such technology it’s going to be the Germans or the Japanese, not the FA using Microsoft bloody paint to draw on dodgy lines in a picture frame.
Last edited: