Wait... What?Just had a text. It simply read
Michael Dawson will be the next Forest manager.
Not saying I’m happy about that but just passing on what I’ve heard.
Just had a text. It simply read
Michael Dawson will be the next Forest manager.
Not saying I’m happy about that but just passing on what I’ve heard.
Wait... What?
Only yesterday I was moaning about why the hell we are paying folk like Daws footballers wages to be a vocal coach in the dressing room. I was like give him a coaches role and 5k a month not 20k a week or whatver he's on.. As for managing the side, quite pathetic but att he same time, its hardly triangles and overlaps we're seeing from CH is it? Im sure most of us could stick the same players on the pitch and tell them what they 'should' be doing
Agreed, but there are times when he could be a bit more flexible in approach & play that hand differently & betterTrue. Would there be any change in results? CH is not a bad manager. He is playing the hand that was given to him.
Jonathan Woodgate and Neil Warnock are two great examples of that in actionI have always thought that in todays game players respond to a manager more their age and who they may like, nothing else is particularly relevent as they pretty much do as they please anyway. If it saves money it would be fine by me.
Agreed, but there are times when he could be a bit more flexible in approach & play that hand differently & better
Jonathan Woodgate and Neil Warnock are two great examples of that in action